Warning Signals to Watch For When Hiring an Offshore Development Team > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A number produced without questions should be treated as a bad sign. An experienced provider will come back with questions first: about users and volumes. A vendor that commits to a figure before understanding the scope is pricing a guess, and a guess will be corrected later — and you will pay for it.

Look out for a gap between the people you meet and the developers actually assigned. Ask for specific people rather than roles software development company in dubai the statement of work, with a provision covering replacement. A provider that talks only about abstract roles and never names people is reserving the option to staff you with whoever is free.

Require the source repository from the first week. A provider that shows nothing between demos is inviting you to take delivery on faith. Daily commits tell you the actual pace far better than a weekly report. This extends to the automated test suite: if there is no pipeline, promises about quality are just talk.

Ambiguous contract language around code ownership is never an accident. The contract needs to state explicitly that all deliverables belong to the client as they are paid for. Look too at which country's law applies and how payments are structured: heavy prepayment with no milestone tied to it takes away the only leverage you have.

Finally, pay attention to communication. Establish what overlap there will be each day, who handles your questions and within what time. A few hours of overlap is usually enough; none at all converts a five-minute question into get a software development quote lost day. Careless writing in the sales phase will not improve under delivery pressure.